isnt it a good test case for having IRT object in RIPE db as well.
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Shane Kerr
<shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:
All,
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 19:45 +0000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
> Actually, it is. The string to enter in the web interface, in the input box is:
>
> -BL 212.86.64.0 - 212.86.79.255
>
> or alternatively, you should be able to select the -L or -l from the
> "Advanced Search Form" interface.
>
> But it looks like over there it is not offered on a simple point-n-click basis ;-)
> Nevertheless, each individual flag option can be requested explicitely in the
> input field of the web-inerface.
I tried the "Abuse Finder" tool for this and it didn't seem to help:
http://lab.db.ripe.net/portal/abuse-finder.htm
The heuristics are described here:
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/Paul_P_/content-updated-heuristics-abuse-finder-service
Maybe it makes sense to have some fallback to non-abuse-specific
contacts (admin-c/tech-c) if no abuse contacts have been defined?
Perhaps with a warning that no actual abuse contacts have been
registered....
--
Shane