It’d be interesting to take individual names of the people most vocal in their objections and feed them through LinkedIn - that assumption you made about dealing with spam would soon be tested.
From: anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2020 9:44 PM
To: Sara Veronica Marcolla
Cc: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] @EXT: RE: working in new version of 2019-04 (Validation of "abuse-mailbox")
> I do not see so far any concrete proposal in the sense of addressing
> issues, only shooting down proposals (for good or bad reasons
the desire to stop a whack-a-mole does not imply a responsibility to
make moles.
a lot of folk here actually deal with spam, or likely they would not be
on this list. this does not oblige them to support all proposals.
randy