On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 05:06:37PM +0100, Carlos Friaas via anti-abuse-wg wrote:
The same way it happens with lack of payment,
explicitly part of the contract (SSA).
or delivering false/forged information to the NCC.
explicitly part of the contract. You are trying to change the contract. You can't do that here.
with, i.e. punishment by withdrawal of resources.
It shouldn't be their decision, it should be the experts' decision.
It gets better. By *what* authority does your expert get to decide that a LIR should be punished? Deo gratias? It can't be a contractual obligation, I have no damn contract with some expert...
It's possibly my fault, but (in this long thread) i still fail to read from someone that hijacking is not offensive, and thus it should be tolerated by the community. I understand you are trying to take this into a grey area by comparison with other examples/abuse.
It is quite possible to find "hijacking" offensive and yet to oppose a dangerous and totalitarian policy. rgds, SL