In message <51C977BF.1090908@powerweb.de>, Frank Gadegast <ripe-anti-spam-wg@powerweb.de> wrote:
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Sounds like a good start ... but I doubt if this should be the job of the anti-abuse-wg or its chair.
I would rather prever, if there would be somebody at the RIPE NCC having this job, and setting up another wg maillinglist (like abuse-audit@ripe.net) ...
I personally do not like to be flodded with discussions about specific networks, that might or might not be audited again ...
If this gets changed, Im +1
I can understand the concern, so yes, I personally wouldn't have any objection to there being a separate mailing list for discussions of issues with specific networks or, as I put it, specific allocations. (I can easly imagine that there might exist some cases in which there are noticable problems with some specific allocation that are not really problems for the relevant AS as a whole.) Regards, rfg