Hi,
Do the proposers intend the requirement for the "abuse-mailbox:" attribute to be enforced in any way and if so, how?
Not having an abuse-mailbox attribute in any object will lead to not being able to reference an object by the abuse-c. Because business rules will request this. So the questions is just what will happen if somebody does not have an abuse-c. Since the "abuse-c:" is obligatory, the usual RIPE NCC rules would apply (not compliance would constitute policy infringement and would lead to the deregistration of the relevant resources, as described in the closure and deregistration document under the section c.Incorrect registration of the allocation/assignment in the RIPE Database: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-517#b11c and https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-517#b2 But please keep in mind, that this process has nothing to do with the proposal itself. Thanks, Tobias -- abusix