On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
Fat fingers,
...we all have it :-)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:17 AM Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> wrote:
Honestly, I think it's the opposite. If the NCC terminates a membership agreement, it should be liable for all the consequences of a wrong decision no matter how exactly the decision is made and what arbiters/experts/oracles/grandmoms were asked for a definitive advice.
.., because if it turns out that the experts or oracles prepared a bad advice, it would be the NCC's responsibility for not choosing a better set of experts of oracles.
This sounds a bit far fetched to me... I think it's not the NCC's role to select people, it should be the community's...
In any case, an individual won't be able to compensate a financial damage
Liability insurance? (yes, i know... cost)
of an average ISP being shut down anyway, so it must be an org, and highly unlikely it could be that individual's employer.
Does a RIPE NCC Service Agreement termination mean that an ISP or a company is necessarily shutdown...??? The NCC's membership base is not exclusively formed by ISPs to start with... If someone doesn't abide by the rules, and needs to keep supplying services to 3rd parties, it can resort to other LIR's services. Yes, that will at least imply a renumbering, which means added cost, but it will not necessarily mean the company will face a shutdown. Regards, Carlos
-- Töma