Hi Esa,

Thank you for your consideration. If there is a people with authority to give moral lesson is the Finnish. A nation that respects ethnic diversity and is descended from more than 120 nationalities.

One day I will attend the opera festival in the medieval castle surrounded by the blue waters of the Saimaa.

Let me question some of your concepts.

> you don't call people nazi unless they have been convicted. Specially not somebody in Germany. Neither do you call them criminal unless convicted.

I accessed the Finland newspapers (highly prized press freedom) and they called that person who allegedly detonated a bomb in Manchester, a terrorist. Has he been convicted?

Using your words I would say that people should not act like a Nazi, especially not somebody in Germany.

People are condemned for their acts not because they are criminal or because of their convictions or ideologies. Thankfully we have the guarantee of the Law of being what we want, including of being a Nazi.

> I don't understand what your goal when you use this kind of language. Are you trying to change something to a positive direction, or are you just letting pressure out? If former, you're failing.

Why do you think I'm failing? Everything is running exactly as I planned. Thanks to you, Andre, Brian, Jeffrey, Volker. My goal is to expose a ISP owner to their colleagues inside a community that, like other communities or categories or professions, they act in the defense of their members, corporatism, in a flagrant false ethics. When you have to deal with this false ethics and with people who use crystal balls to form knowledge and prejudge, the strategy is to provoke such people's reaction.

Anyway, thanks

Marilson

From: Esa Laitinen

Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 9:59 AM

To: Marilson

Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] fake abuse lists

Hi, Marilson

the language you use is not what will bring anything forward. You just ruin whatever respect you had from others.

you don't call people nazi unless they have been convicted. Specially not somebody in Germany. Neither do you call them criminal unless convicted.

I don't understand what your goal when you use this kind of language. Are you trying to change something to a positive direction, or are you just letting pressure out? If former, you're failing. The people you convince that kind of language are not the ones that can change something.

In any case, the moderator told to pipe it down. I hope you do.

yours,

esa

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:16 PM Marilson <marilson.mapa@gmail.com> wrote:

On May 28 Andre wrote:

> I am not a criminal and not a criminal company. So, I do
> not have criminal competitors.

Although this phrase is beyond my capacity for understanding, I think I should greet you for not fearing unfair competition.

> Just on a side note, my opinion is that you calling Martin Hetzner a
> Nazi (and a sociopath) is not acceptable behavior.

I'll explain to you what is not acceptable behavior:

1- It is you being customer of a provider owner with a professional life history worthy of an arrogant sociopath with the attitudes of a Nazi despot - reread the curriculum I related.

2- It is you acting like some Afrikaners who defended the principles of the National Socialist Party - read Nazism - that gave support to the maintenance of apartheid in your homeland. Heil Hetzner!

3- It is an ISP owner refusing to suspend a reported customer numerous times, for 18 months, with evidence of the practice of crime.

4- It is an ISP owner to allow a victim of his client to spend 18 months denouncing the same scam, the same scammer.

> It is hate speech in itself and disrespectful to civil society.

A hate speech: If I lived in Germany I would have sued this tramp. From where I am I can only insult and report him to the world.

Disrespect to civil society are his relationships with sociopath despots like Putin, are his attacks on freedom of the press, are his pursuits those who fight spammers and give support for reported criminals.

Disrespect to civil society it is to defend and hire the services of people who should be arrested.

Heil Coetzee!

Marilson

From: ox

Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 2:21 AM

To: Marilson

Cc: anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net

Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] fake abuse lists

On Sat, 27 May 2017 21:26:42 -0300
"Marilson" <marilson.mapa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If you continue to call your competitors from criminal companies
> someone will call you Pot. :)
>
No, firstly, there is no competition between lists... All lists have
different data and sometimes different priorities and focus. (Did you
see the SORBS lists 30 days, recent, all time - this has time focus -
some lists adds weight for RIR, some lists focus on actual syndicates,
some on actual bot tech, some aggregate bots & syndicates - for
example - on your one IP number you may be hosting 900 domains and
only one of those belong to a crime syndicate sending spear or to a
child pornographer. - if you are on that list - find your criminal - and get rid of them...
some lists are rolled by hand, dedicated and with zero (or next to
zero) false positives. some lists randomly list ip numbers, etc.

a list is a list and the quality of a list depends on the maintenance thereof and
the value it ads to society. This value is sometimes displayed in the
'score' or numerical weight attached to programs similar to spamassassin
assigned to a list by independent users.

Secondly, I am not a criminal and not a criminal company. So, I do
not have criminal competitors.

Lastly, if there is a list that is listing other lists for no reason and also lists
honeynets (traps) and victims - the advantage for doing that is only to
criminal enterprise.

Just on a side note, my opinion is that you calling Martin Hetzner a
Nazi (and a sociopath) is not acceptable behavior.

It is hate speech in itself and disrespectful to civil society.

Andre