Hi all, Le vendredi 14 juin 2019, sandoche Balakrichenan <sandoche.balakrichenan@afnic.fr <mailto:sandoche.balakrichenan@afnic.fr>> a écrit : Dear all, The origin for this initiative came from the ICANN SSAC document on DNS and IoT : https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-105-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-105-en.pdf> As RIPE IoT chairs, we asked (in the RIPE IoT mailing list) whether we should prepare a Best Current Operational Practice (BCOP) document in RIPE scope for proactively mitigating IoT attacks. From both the Academy and the Industry, we got interests to contribute to this work. Possible contributors name can be found at the end of this mail: Thanks for your input on how to proceed further: 1. Do you think the topic is useful for the RIPE community? If yes, any guidance on how to proceed further will be appreciated. Dear Sandoche, Thanks for this initiative. ...IMHO, the usefulness of this kind of topic is based on fact and we can easily gather these facts in every communities around the Internet ecosystem ; including the RIPE Community. Internet Society have shared a blog post [1] about the collaborative security. Maybe you are following a similar security approach :-/ This week i heard about an hidden microphone [2] inside an IoT home equipment, distributed in France... For reference, you have a blog [3] about how the RIPE Atlas network “of IoT” could be used as a “BCOP” for the IoT industry :-) 1. Should this discussion be initiated in the RIPE IoT WG and not in the BCOP task force? Surely the two WG matter. But if you need useful information about IoT, the IoT WG with its community is the appropriate place to go... ...let's say, you can prepare a survey for them, and include most of them in the process ; amongst other collaborative|inclusive possible actions... __ [1] https://www.internetsociety.org/collaborativesecurity/approach/ <https://www.internetsociety.org/collaborativesecurity/approach/> • https://www.internetsociety.org/collaborativesecurity/ <https://www.internetsociety.org/collaborativesecurity/> [2]: In French — https://www.numerama.com/tech/526115-monsieur-cuisine-connect-lidl-sexplique... <https://www.numerama.com/tech/526115-monsieur-cuisine-connect-lidl-sexplique-sur-laffaire-du-micro-cache.html> [3]: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/kistel/ripe-atlas-probes-as-iot-devices <https://labs.ripe.net/Members/kistel/ripe-atlas-probes-as-iot-devices> 1. Anyone in this mailing list would be interested in contributing or provided references to people who will be interested to contribute? People who have already expressed interest in contributing: *From the Academy: * 1. Andrzej Duda (http://duda.imag.fr/) 2. Maciej Korczynski (http://mkorczynski.com/) *From the Industry:* 1. Ad Bresser (SPIN product manager) 2. Eliott Lear (CISCO) 3. Jacques Latour (CIRA - The Canadian Internet registry) 4. Peter Steinhauser (Embedd.com) 5. Possiblity from CZNIC (Czech Internet registry) who are involved in Turris router project Sandoche. I'm new here, then i hope this helps :-) Regards, --sb. __ http://www.chretiennement.org