All,

I agree with Patrik, nicely written and I am glad the RIPE NCC is
tracking such things. It is a pity that these issues apparently need
to be re-visited constantly, but I appreciate that the RIPE NCC is
willing to fight the same battles!

Cheers,

--
Shane

At 2016-10-20 14:14:25 +0200

"Patrik Fältström" <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:

> A good response, thanks!
>
> Specifically:
>
> > While the liaison statement notes the Study Group's intention to cooperate closely with
> > "the IETF, the IPv6 Forum, ISOC, ETSI and other relevant stakeholders and academic
> > partners", we would suggest that such cooperation (in the context of IPv6 addressing)
> > should be characterised by the Study Group's incorporation of policies or best practices
> > developed in these other communities.
>
>    Patrik
>
> On 20 Oct 2016, at 11:01, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
>
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > We would like to inform you that we have published our response to a Liaison Statement that we recently received on behalf of ITU Study Group 20, which is working on the Internet of Things (IoT) and its applications, including smart cities and communities.
> >
> > The incoming Liaison Statement as well as our response can be found on the RIPE NCC’s website:
> >
> > https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/industry-developments/ripe-ncc-supplies-feedback-to-itu-study-group-on-internet-of-things
> >
> > In case you have any questions regarding this topic, feel free to contact us via email, this mailing list or you can contact me or one of my colleagues during next week’s RIPE meeting, taking place in Madrid, Spain.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Marco Hogewoning
> > --
> > External Relations - RIPE NCC
> >