I would like to draw your attention to a particular item in the IANAXFER proposal:

It would be appreciated if more community members found some time between the festivities to read and comment on the proposals.




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: [NRO-IANAXFER] NRO-NC role in Review Committee
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 15:00:56 +0200
From: Alan Barrett <apb@cequrux.com>
To: ianaxfer@nro.net


There has been a suggestion that the work of the "Review 
Committee" proposed in the CRISP draft should be handled by the 
NRO-NC, or alternatively, that the chair of the NRO-NC should be 
co-opted to serve on the Review Committee.

The CRISP Team believes that is would be wise to to keep the 
operational performance review process independent of the policy 
development process.  Because the NRO-NC (or ASO-AC) has a role 
in global policy development, we think that the proposed Review 
Committee should be independent of the NRO-NC.

The draft proposal says "The NRO Executive Council shall establish 
a Review Committee that will advise and assist the NRO Executive 
Council in its periodic review. Any such Review Committee should 
be a team composed of representatives from each RIR region ...". 
The CRISP Team has not discussed how many members the Review 
Committee might have, or what procedure the NRO EC might follow in 
choosing the members.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

_______________________________________________
ianaxfer mailing list
ianaxfer@nro.net
https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer