Hi Roger, Thank you for your constructive comment. To be clear, we made the announcement for candidates before this meeting. And, candidates have come forward (and still can). I think we can discuss what we'd like these people to do or not do, but I don't think it's productive to walk back the process to review a conversation we could be having in parallel. Thanks, Meredith On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Collin Anderson <collin@measurementlab.net> wrote: <snip>
I believe that would put the schedule at:
June 3: Deadline for declaration of candidacy. June 4: Start of discussion about requirements and candidate qualifications. June 17: End of discussion. June 18: Chair starts consideration of consensus. July 1: Chair conveys consensus.
Is that correct? Does it seem fair to others?
I don't disagree on the dates, but isn't it strange to have people come forward BEFORE we discuss what we want from them?
Suggest we rather start now on figuring out what we want and possible candidates can announce themself over the next few weeks so by around 17.June we have a good idea of who are interested, and what we expect from them.
--
Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no
-- Meredith Whittaker Open Research Lead Google NYC