>
> The problem of delay in registrations by "regional"
> registries could perhaps be overcome by an automated
> "handle assignment" service by RIPE, where a handle
> could be obtained interactively by authorised persons.
> Given the turnaround-time with the new DB-software,
> I really don't see where there is potential for delay
> in registering objects?
> But maybe we could (on paper) relax the rules a bit to
> officially allow the registration of person objects that
> are not (yet) referenced by other objects.
> The software never prohibited this, as much as I know.
> As NL domain registrar I'm used to honouring requests
> for (new) registrations as soon as possible. I don't
> like a registration to become a multi-stage procedure:
> - register the domain and associated person(s) in
> my NL database;
> - wait till the whole business has been submitted
> to the RIPE database (weekly, automated);
> - see what handles RIPE has assigned and add them
> to the entries in my NL database;
> - wait again till the stuff has been sent to RIPE.
> Even if I would make the submission a daily one, it
> would still take several days before the registration
> in my NL database and in the RIPE database have been
> finalised. If RIPE would provide an interactive way
> of obtaining a handle, then there would be no delay.
>
> Piet
Piet,
you've clearly expressed the same worries I actually have: I don't like
the RIPE registration process to become not as fast and easy as it is now!
But I don't see why the solution of distributing Internet handles
assignment (the actual way is not the point: using number ranges, appending
different suffixes, ...) is not taken in serious consideration.
---------- ----------
Antonio_Blasco Bonito E-Mail: bonito(a)nis.garr.it
GARR - Network Information Service c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito
c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR Tel: +39 (50) 593246
Via S. Maria, 36 Telex: 500371 CNUCE I
56126 PISA Italy Fax: +39 (50) 904052
---------- ----------