==> From: Marcel Wiget
>
> Hi Wilfried,
> But, at least spoken for SWITCH, we would like to see a possiblity to
> store routing and authority information not only for IPv4 but also for
> other network protocols. In January I suggested already on the db-wg list
> something like a network protocol address prefix. I don't see a need anymore
> for a special CLNS proposal but I see a need for a more general view of
> network entries in the RIPE database.
> For sure we will need an enhancement to support IP6. All the features
> implemented in the new whois server related to CIDR simplifies the usage
> for any routing objects based on a longest prefix match ..., and yes,
> CLNS falls in this area as well.
>
I agree, spoken for SURFnet, with Marcel.
All the best,
Victor