January 2000 - db-wg - mailman.ripe.net

<auto-dbm@ripe.net> is slow this afternoon.
by RIPE Database Administration 17 May '18

17 May '18

Dear Colleagues, Because of a very high level of use this afternoon, the response time of <auto-dbm(a)ripe.net> is longer than normal. I have made contact with those who are responsible and I expect the situation to improve as the machine works through the queue. Please be patient. Obviously we at the RIPE NCC Database Group are continuously working to make the performance of the database as good as possible. However, we cannot make improvements in zero time. We thank you for your co-operation up to now and we ask for your continued co-operation so that everyone receives the best possible service. If you have anymore questions, please contact <ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net>. Regards, Ambrose Magee ____________________________ RIPE Database Administration.

2 2

RE: DB consistancy checking tools
by Matthew Robinson 07 Mar '00

07 Mar '00

I won't be at RIPE-35 as my first child is due at the same time but I'll definitely knock something together as a draft. If other people are interested then things should go ahead at RIPE-35 otherwise I do have permission from my wife to attend RIPE-36 ;-) Kind regards Matthew -----Original Message----- From: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet [mailto:woeber@cc.univie.ac.at] Sent: 20 January 2000 14:55 To: matthew(a)planet.net.uk Cc: lir-wg(a)ripe.net; db-wg(a)ripe.net; woeber(a)cc.univie.ac.at Subject: RE: DB consistancy checking tools Matthew, I think this is an interesting proposal: >I have been wondering recently whether a separate group should be set up for >the sole purpose of creating tools/advise/methods/hints 'n' tips for LIR's >to keep on top of their entries and make management easier. A sort of RIPE >users working group not concerned with designing objects for the database >but how to put existing objects in it, remove them, manage them, etc. > >My 2c > >Matthew To start things moving, could you come up with a coarse draft of ideas and short-term goals to take up? On the more formal side, one of the possible solutions to accomodate that activity might be to create a TaskForce to work on well-defined items during RIPE35 (do you intend to particpate?). This TF might be supported by both LIR and DB, or sponsored by whichever group is seen to be appropriate... Wilfried.

6 6

Fault vs. feature in the 'mnt-by' mechanism
by Carsten Schiefner 28 Jan '00

28 Jan '00

Folks, I would like to draw your attention to a fact that might be intended as a feature but what I consider more or less as a fault: I can't find any good reason that it is possible to protect objects which are previously unprotected or protected with an own mnt object also with other strong ("password") mnt objects without knowing the password of this maintainer. So it is possible for almost everyone to enter a bunch of bogus objects in the RIPE database without protection and then - as a 2nd step - to update all these objects, now including our company's mnt objects - thus we will become "responsible" for these bogus objects in a way, but we won't get aware of it. This may not be so significant for person objects, but is definitely much more serious regarding AS or route objects - so a redesign of this protection mechanism should be discussed at least. Please see http://www.ripe.net/cgi-bin/whois?sg4456-ripe as an example. Best regards, Carsten Schiefner -- Carsten Schiefner mailto:carsten.schiefner@tcpip-gmbh.de TCP/IP GmbH, Berlin (Germany) http://www.tcpip-gmbh.de Phone: +49.30.443366-0 Fax: +49.30.443366-15 Mobile: +49.172.5425797 TCP/IP GmbH runs the Contrib.Net backbone http://www.contrib.net ======================================================================

2 1

New tool announcement from Merit/IRRd: IRRj
by Jonathan Poland 22 Jan '00

22 Jan '00

Merit's IRRd team is pleased to announce the 1.0 Beta version of IRRj, a Java interface to the Internet Routing Registry. IRRj replaces the traditional e-mail submission process for database objects, and offers the following features: - Speed: IRRj opens a TCP socket connection to IRRd and provides fast, immediate feedback on the success or failure of your object submission. - Authentication: supports CRYPT-PW, PGP-FROM, and NONE authentication schemes transparently. - IRRd query support: offers full querying capabilities to retrieve objects for editing and resubmission. - Custom editing features: automatically appends delete fields to all objects, imports object templates. - Split window interface: IRRj includes a submission window and an IRRd feedback window. IRRj can be invoked from the Web or as a standalone application. System requirements are Sun's JDK (free from java.sun.com), Netscape 4.5+ or Java Plugin 1.2.2 (Internet Explorer or Netscape on Win32). IRRj runs on any Java capable machine, including Windows, Solaris, and most flavors of Unix. IRRj object submission will work with the RADB and any other IRR database that supports the IRRd synchronous object submission protocol. See http://www.irrd.net for more information about the freely available IRRd software. IRRj is freeware and can be downloaded and/or invoked from the web at: http://www.merit.edu/ipma/javairr/irr.html Please contact the IRRd team (irrd-support(a)merit.edu) with comments, feedback, suggestions, or questions. Jon Poland IRRd Team

1 0

RE: DB consistancy checking tools
by Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet 20 Jan '00

20 Jan '00

Matthew, I think this is an interesting proposal: >I have been wondering recently whether a separate group should be set up for >the sole purpose of creating tools/advise/methods/hints 'n' tips for LIR's >to keep on top of their entries and make management easier. A sort of RIPE >users working group not concerned with designing objects for the database >but how to put existing objects in it, remove them, manage them, etc. > >My 2c > >Matthew To start things moving, could you come up with a coarse draft of ideas and short-term goals to take up? On the more formal side, one of the possible solutions to accomodate that activity might be to create a TaskForce to work on well-defined items during RIPE35 (do you intend to particpate?). This TF might be supported by both LIR and DB, or sponsored by whichever group is seen to be appropriate... Wilfried. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wilfried Woeber : e-mail: Woeber(a)CC.UniVie.ac.at Computer Center - ACOnet : Tel: +43 1 4277 - 140 33 Vienna University : Fax: +43 1 4277 - 9 140 Universitaetsstrasse 7 : RIPE-DB Handle: WW144 A-1010 Vienna, Austria, Europe : PGP public key ID 0xF0ACB369 __________________________________________________________________________

1 0

None
by RIPE Database Administration 20 Jan '00

20 Jan '00

Dear All, Following a request from the Chair, here is the status of the works on the new implementation of the RIPE database. Currently we are testing the query part of the database. It has been made publicly available at http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/db/reimp/ on December 31, 1999 and a message has been sent to the db-beta mailing list. The database contains about 2.5 million objects corresponding to all the objects as of June 17th. You should also be able to query it directly at reimp.ripe.net, port 43. Please have a look and let us know if you spot something terribly wrong. We would like to detect as many differences as possible with respect to the old database. We know that some types of queries returned wrong information in the old incarnation, notably the more/less specific route/inetnum queries. This changed now with the introduction of radix trees. There may be some bugs though, so everybody is encouraged to try the server and compare the output. The source code has also been released. It can be found at our ftp site: ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/dbase/reimp/RIP-0.1.0beta1.tar.gz All comments are welcome. We are now actively working on making the server a near-real-time mirror client of our main (old) server, so that the data in both is nearly identical at all times. We are confident this will be available in the next days, maybe weeks. The part which needs most work is the update part. We are also working on that quite hard now. Our goal is to present the community with a working beta version including updates, around the time of the coming RIPE meeting at the end of February 1900^H^H^H^H2000. If you have any more questions, please don't hesitate to contact <ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net>. Regards, Marek Bukowy ____________________________ RIPE Database Administration.

1 0

RE: DB consistancy checking tools
by Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet 20 Jan '00

20 Jan '00

With reference to: >From: stephenb(a)uk.uu.net >Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 11:49:34 +0000 (GMT) >Subject: DB consistancy checking tools >To: lir-wg(a)ripe.net > >Hi > After making a number of NEWBLOCK requests and recieving the > information back of the errors in the DB for the previous block, > i would like to make the suggestion to the RIPE NCC the we are > allowed accuess to this most useful tool. This way we could do > the consitancy checks and get our house in order before making > the NEWBLOCK request, lessening the load on RIPE and speeding > up the allocation of more CIDR. > >If there is enough interest can we add this as a point of discussion at >the LIR working group, or should it be in the DB group. > >BTW i do like the new web site. > >Regards, >-- >---------------------------------- >E-Mail: stephenb(a)uk.uu.net >Phone: +44 (0)1223 581051 I've got one tech Q and one org Q: Tech: Would you want to propose a "public release" of the tool (e.g. to be able to deploy it in a local environment), or would it be useful / sufficient to be able to trigger the tool (for a given address range) and to have access to the result? I'm aware of the fact that there might be access and/or security related issues requiring a solution, but we might be able to solve that as soon as we know what to look for.... Org.: Where is this to go? LIR or DB? Preferences? ( In general I prefer a path where the goals and application requirements emerge from an "application WG" and the implementation is then passed on to the DB-WG. ) Wilfried.

1 0

RE: DB consistancy checking tools
by Matthew Robinson 20 Jan '00

20 Jan '00

I have been wondering recently whether a separate group should be set up for the sole purpose of creating tools/advise/methods/hints 'n' tips for LIR's to keep on top of their entries and make management easier. A sort of RIPE users working group not concerned with designing objects for the database but how to put existing objects in it, remove them, manage them, etc. My 2c Matthew -----Original Message----- From: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet [mailto:woeber@cc.univie.ac.at] Sent: 20 January 2000 13:07 To: stephenb(a)uk.uu.net Cc: lir-wg(a)ripe.net; woeber(a)cc.univie.ac.at; db-wg(a)ripe.net Subject: RE: DB consistancy checking tools

1 0

Top 100 Maintainers List 20000119
by RIPE Database Administration 19 Jan '00

19 Jan '00

1 0

Top 100 Maintainers List 20000103
by RIPE Database Administration 04 Jan '00

04 Jan '00

1 0