Andrei,
The existing ripe2rpsl tool will automatically translate "AS-" to "ASN-"
for the aut-num object and I think "ASN-" is more meaningful than "AS_".
Best Regards.
Ping Lu
Cable & Wireless Global
Network Tools and Analysis Group, USA
W: +1-703-292-2359
E: plu(a)cw.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrei Robachevsky [mailto:andrei@ripe.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 11:10 AM
> To: db-wg(a)ripe.net; routing-wg(a)ripe.net; Migration TF; lir-wg(a)ripe.net
> Subject: Another issue related to the migration
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> [Apologies for duplicate messages]
>
> One issue related to RIPE-181 to RPSL migration escaped our
> attention and has
> not been discussed. It is related to reserved prefixes that
> cannot appear in
> object names according to RPSL specification (RFC2622) which says:
>
> "Names starting with certain prefixes are reserved for
> certain object types.
> Names starting with "as-" are reserved for as set names.
> Names starting with
> "rs-" are reserved for route set names. Names starting with
> "rtrs-" are
> reserved for router set names. Names starting with "fltr-"
> are reserved for
> filter set names. Names starting with "prng-" are reserved
> for peering set
> names."
>
> Unfortunately "as-name:" attribute is an object name in RPSL
> and we have 133
> aut-num objects with as-name starting with reserved 'AS-' prefix.
>
> Our suggestion how to deal with these objects is:
>
> 1. Send a message to the maintainers of these objects asking
> them to change the
> name to avoid conflict with RPSL specification.
> 2. Give two-week notice period after which ripe-dbm will
> convert non compliant
> as-names using the following mapping: AS-ASNAME -> AS_ASNAME.
>
> This is more a "cosmetic" change as as-name is not even a
> lookup key in the RIPE
> Database.
>
> Your comments and suggestions are appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Andrei Robachevsky
> DB Group Manager
> RIPE NCC
>