Hello there colleagues,
for some last years I'm working with RIPE DB I think it would be useful to
have some kind of "sub-allocation" inetnum objects. Brief example in our
current situation:
there is downstream provider behind us, currently without its own address
block, so I've assigned /21 for them. All that space was of course
well-documented, with ripe-141's covering all the nets, and appropriate
inetnum objects have been created. But, for aggregating purposes, I
suppose aggregating inetnum for the whole /21 would be useful and
self-documenting. I can create such object, but such object is considered
as overlapped.
I think about explicit route-object also, but size behind current minimum
allocation size (/19 for 195/8 or /20 for newer) somewhat stops me :)
Your (both community and especially RIPE NCC people) suggestions are
strongly expected ;-) Thank you.
Sincerely,
D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck(a)rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------
