April 2014 - db-wg - mailman.ripe.net

<auto-dbm@ripe.net> is slow this afternoon.
by RIPE Database Administration 17 May '18

17 May '18

Dear Colleagues, Because of a very high level of use this afternoon, the response time of <auto-dbm(a)ripe.net> is longer than normal. I have made contact with those who are responsible and I expect the situation to improve as the machine works through the queue. Please be patient. Obviously we at the RIPE NCC Database Group are continuously working to make the performance of the database as good as possible. However, we cannot make improvements in zero time. We thank you for your co-operation up to now and we ask for your continued co-operation so that everyone receives the best possible service. If you have anymore questions, please contact <ripe-dbm(a)ripe.net>. Regards, Ambrose Magee ____________________________ RIPE Database Administration.

2 2

Draft minutes of RIPE 67 meeting
by Nigel Titley 05 Nov '14

05 Nov '14

Please find draft minutes of the DB-WG meeting held in Athens today. Comments, complaint, misrepresentations etc, to me Nigel

1 1

Proposal to remove "referral-by" attribute in "mntner" object or make it optional
by Martin Tõnusoo 06 Oct '14

06 Oct '14

Hello, "referral-by" attribute(defined in RFC2725) is mandatory in "mntner" object: [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ whois -BHrh whois.ripe.net -t mntner | grep referral-by referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [ ] [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ I checked the db-wg mailing-list archive since January 2000 and only discussion I found regarding this attribute was from Engin Gunduz(former RIPE NCC Senior Software Engineer) in June 2004: [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ for year in {2000..2014}; do for month in January February March April May June July August September October November December; do wget -q --no-check-certificate https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/$(printf '%s-%s.txt.gz\n' "$year" "$month"); done; done [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ zgrep -Hi "referral-by" * 2000-August.txt.gz:-irb (or -ireferral-by) <maintainer name> 2000-August.txt.gz:Returns all objects whose referral-by attribute matches the query 2001-August.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2001-May.txt.gz:If you mean referral-by, it points to mntner handle, mandatory in mntner 2003-April.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2003-April.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2003-August.txt.gz:> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz: referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz:> referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz:> referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz:> > referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-December.txt.gz:> > referral-by: MAINT-RGNET 2003-July.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2004-April.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2004-June.txt.gz:referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [inverse key] 2004-June.txt.gz:referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2004-June.txt.gz:Subject: [db-wg] Proposed Change 2004.2: Removal of "referral-by:" Attribute 2004-June.txt.gz:[2004.2] Removal of "referral-by:" Attribute from the MNTNER Object 2004-June.txt.gz:Remove the "referral-by:" attribute from the MNTNER objects' schema. This 2004-June.txt.gz:The "referral-by:" attribute was introduced into MNTNER objects when the 2004-June.txt.gz:"referral-by:" is defined in RFC2725: 2004-June.txt.gz: referral-by This attribute is required in the maintainer object. It 2004-June.txt.gz: referral-by. An auth-override can only be added to a maintainer 2004-June.txt.gz: those identified by the maintainer in the referral-by have 2004-June.txt.gz: "referral-by" attribute is now mandatory in the "maintainer" object 2004-June.txt.gz: referenced by a "referral-by" attribute elsewhere. 2004-June.txt.gz:The RIPE NCC introduced the "referral-by:" attribute as a place-holder, 2004-May.txt.gz:referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [inverse key] 2005-May.txt.gz:> referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [inverse key] 2005-May.txt.gz:> > referral-by: [mandatory] [single] [inverse key] 2005-November.txt.gz:>referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2005-November.txt.gz:> >referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2005-November.txt.gz:> > >referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-July.txt.gz:> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-July.txt.gz:>> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-June.txt.gz: referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-June.txt.gz: referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-June.txt.gz:> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2007-June.txt.gz:> referral-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT 2012-April.txt.gz:referral-by: DEV-ROOT-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:> referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:> referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:>> referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT 2013-March.txt.gz:>>> referral-by: TRUBNIKOV-MNT [martint@ ~/ripe-db]$ He also proposed to remove the "referral-by" attribute, but there was no feedback to his e-mail. One can read his e-mail here: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2004-June/002797.html In addition, while RIPE database manual says that "referral-by attribute may never be altered after the addition of the maintainer", one can easily change it at least in current RIPE database version. Is the "referral-by" attribute obsolete? Or is it needed in some specific situation? If not, I propose to remove the "referral-by" attribute in "mntner" object or at least make it optional. WBR, Martin Tonusoo -------------------------- LINXTELECOM www.linxtelecom.com -------------------------- NOC 24/7: +372 622 3300

13 25

last-modified:, a succesor to changed:
by Job Snijders 16 Sep '14

16 Sep '14

Dear DB Working Group, Assessing the "freshness" of database objects can be a useful component in many business processes, but as it stands today the "changed:" attribute is severely crippled: Eleanor:~ job$ whois -h whois.ripe.net AS15562 | grep changed Eleanor:~ job$ whois -h whois.radb.net AS15562 | grep changed changed: unread(a)ripe.net 20000101 Eleanor:~ job$ Fantastic! Now we are absolutely none the wiser. :-) I propose that we introduce a new attribute called "last-modified" as a replacement for functionality offered by past implementations of "changed:". The "last-modified" attribute is set by the whois server software and represents the date and time at which the last succesful modification was received by the server. When a user submits an update for an object in which the attribute is present, the server software will ignore the attribute, insert its own attribute with the current time, and present a warning to the user that the user's version of "last-modified" was ignored. The "last-modified" attribute should be presented by the server software in all types of objects (autnums, poems, etc) for which the server is responsible (e.g. do not touch foreign or mirrored objects). The date and time are represented following the ISO 8601 [1] profile for complete date plus hours, minutes and seconds, always expressed in UTC, including the special UTC designator 'Z'. The "last-modified" attribute should be presented above, but close to the "source:" attribute. The advantage is that the date and time are both human readable and computer parsable! A valid example "last-modified" attribute would be: last-modified: 2014-04-15T13:15:30Z I look forward to the group's feedback! Also, I'm interested in how people would use this attribute in their workflows or automation. Kind regards, Job [1] - https://xkcd.com/1179/

15 43

Support for expansion of an origin into a list of prefixes
by Job Snijders 01 May '14

01 May '14

Dear RIPE DB-WG, Much like my previous request regarding server side expansion of objects, I'd very much like the RIPE Database team to implement two flags which IRRd currently supports: !g & !6 I've filed an enhancement request on github: https://github.com/RIPE-NCC/whois/issues/73 The !g and !6 flags signficantly reduce the amount of RPSL interpretation a client has to perform, as the server provides the clients with a straight answer (abeit simplified). If the DB team implements such a feature, I'd also very much like an implementation in context or RDAP so I can query for lists of prefixes through HTTP rather than WHOIS. Kind regards, Job

2 1

RIPE Database Release 1.73
by Denis Walker 29 Apr '14

29 Apr '14

Dear colleagues, The RIPE NCC is pleased to announce the RIPE Database software release 1.73 to the Release Candidate (RC) environment. For information about features, changes and how this release might affect your operations, please see the release notes: https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/release-notes/ripe-database-release-1.73 Major features introduced in this release include the: -Addition of a "sponsoring-org:" attribute for End User resources -Addition of a "status:" attribute for all AUT-NUM objects -Change of "status:" values for all legacy (early registration) INETNUM objects to 'LEGACY' This release also fixes a number of issues. More details are available in the release notes. Where necessary, data in the RC Database has been changed to reflect the new/changed attributes. Please check your data and test your implementation in the RC environment. More information about the RC environment is available online: https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/release-notes/rc-release-candidate-envir… We look forward to any questions or comments you might have. Regards, Denis Walker Business Analyst RIPE NCC Database Team

1 0

Proposal: DB object syntax change
by Piotr Strzyzewski 25 Apr '14

25 Apr '14

Dear working group I would like to propose syntax change of the role attribute of the ROLE object in the RIPE DB. Bellow you can find all details. I would like to hear your opinion about this idea and ask for the support to allow RIPE NCC to implement it. ------------- Short description: I would like to propose to change the syntax of the role attribute of the ROLE object from <person-name> to <organisation-name>, where both <person-name> and <organisation-name> are defined in RIPE Database Update Reference Manual. I would like to emphasize that I don't want to change the syntax of the nic-hdl attribute of the ROLE object. Nevertheless, my proposal influence the automatic mechanism of choosing the nic-hdl attribute value of the ROLE object, while it is created with AUTO directive. Rationale: Abuse-c implementation have influenced business procedures of LIRs and have led to increased importance of ROLE object. Since ROLE object is mandatory in the process of proper abuse-c registration, LIRs could be interested in automatic creation of it. Right now, due to its syntax, the role attribute of the ROLE object has number of limitations and cannot accept bunch of characters and or whole labels/words which are natural parts of company names. As an example, it is impossible to create ROLE objects with one of the following role attributes: - Company Father, Son & Daughter Abuse Team - 4U Network Abuse Team - 123 Ltd. Hostmaster - WOW! Network Dept. and so on. Moreover, the original intention was for the ROLE object to represent business roles and not personal data (see: paragraph 1.2.17 of the RIPE Database Update Reference Manual). Taking this into account the <organisation-name> would be the natural choice since it both perfectly solves the problem and is already well defined and implemented. Possible problems: As for now, the nic-hdl attribute of the ROLE object is auto-generated and based on the value of the role attribute. Since <person-name> do not allow all-numeric labels, this mechanism is quite simple. However, similar mechanism exists for the auto-generated organisation attribute of the ORGANISATION object, where <organisation-name> allows this kind of labels. While this is significant change to syntax, I would like to emphasize that <person-name> is a subset of <organisation-name>. This means that even if some people may rely on the current syntax, this change would most probably not influence their procedures. ----------- Best regards, Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski(a)polsl.pl

7 11

RIPE68 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1
by Wilfried Woeber 23 Apr '14

23 Apr '14

Dear DB-WG folks, Chairpersons, "Meeting"! This is the 1st -rough- draft of an agenda for the DB-WG Meeting at RIPE68 in Warsaw, scheduled for Wednesday, May 14, 2014. For time slot allocations please refer to the most up-to-date meeting plan at https://ripe68.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/ The DB-WG Meeting is scheduled for *Wednesday*, starting at 14:00 local time[1], after lunch . The length of our timeslot is 90 Minutes. The overall (draft) RIPE 68 meeting outline is already available at https://ripe68.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/ Please feel free to propose additional topics to be discussed! I'd also suggest that you submit your points of view regarding the topics on the proposed agenda on the mailing list, preferably before the WG meeting's start :-) Best regards, hope to see you soon in Poland, Wilfried. [1] for remote participation, this 12:00 UTC ________________________________________________________________________ A. Administrative Matters . Welcome . select scribe . finalise agenda . approval of minutes from previous WG meeting(s) . review of action list B. Data Base Operational Update (N.N., RIPE NCC) C. New DB-Software functionality - in test, schduled for deployment (sponsoring LIR) D. Proposals for changes to schema - consensus on removing referral-by:? - discussion changed: vs. last-modified E. 2012-07 implementation F. Status update on IETF WEIRDS activities (N.N. t.b.c.) Y. Input from other Working Groups and/or Task Forces - review of abuse contact stuff (N.N. t.b.c.)) Z. AOB ________________________________________________________________________ 23.04.2014 13:20 UTC

1 0

Changes to Syntax of End User Resources in the RIPE Database
by Denis Walker 17 Apr '14

17 Apr '14

Dear colleagues, The RIPE NCC will soon be deploying to our Resource Candidate (RC) Test Environment some changes to all End User resources. These changes are being implemented to satisfy two recently approved policies - ripe-603, "Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Resources" and ripe-605, "RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders". The changes include: -The addition of a "sponsoring-org:" attribute to all End User resources (INETNUM, INET6NUM, AUT-NUM) -The addition of a mandatory "status:" attribute to all AUT-NUM objects -A change of "status:" for all legacy INETNUM objects (including all more specifics) to 'LEGACY' The RC Test Environment will include a copy of the RIPE Database with dummified personal data. All of the status additions and changes will be fully implemented in this test database. The "sponsoring-org:" attributes will all be set to reference a dummy ORGANISATION object in this test database. We do not expect any immediate changes to be necessary for any scripts that you use to generate these objects. Our software is tolerant to these attributes being missing and will generate them where necessary. Provided your scripts are tolerant to unknown attributes, as is recommended in the RPSL RFCs, you should not experience any issues even if your scripts query any of these objects. A comprehensive list of anticipated frequently-asked questions (FAQs) will be published alongside this release. We expect this FAQ will answer most questions. A "remarks:" attribute added to the changed objects will reference this FAQ page. Regards, Denis Walker Business Analyst RIPE NCC Database Team

1 0

Call for agenda items, DB-WG Meeting during RIPE68, Warsaw, PL
by Wilfried Woeber 15 Apr '14

15 Apr '14

Dear DB-WG folks, planning activities for the next RIPE Meeting - RIPE68 in Warsaw, PL, May. 12 - May. 16, 2014, have already started a while ago - thus this _call for agenda items_ for the meeting of the Database Working-Group. Please submit (to the WG list!) your item requests and|or suggest topics for discussion to be included in the draft agenda! Please note that the DataBase-WG meeting is *at the moment* scheduled for *Wednesday* (starting at 14:00 local time). This is according to the *draft* meeting plan - which is pretty stable already, but may still need to be changed as we get closer to the meeting date! The overall (draft) RIPE 68 meeting outline is already available at https://ripe68.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/ Looking forward to a successful meeting and see you soon in Poland! Wilfried.

1 0