I think this is not so much a DB-WG issue, but a NCC members / board issue.
There are two very separate issues here. The first issue is whether folks in Kosovo are being adequately served by RIPE, and it sounds like the answer to that is pretty clearly “no.” The implementation details of _how_ RIPE resolves that are separate from _whether_ it should be solved. The second issue is whether RIPE should be in the business of overriding the ICP-1 delegation of the ccTLD namespace to ISO, which in turn delegates it to the UN Statistics Division. I think that’s inherently a bad idea, and I encourage people to consider what their opinion would be if the ITU decided to override the IANA’s delegation of address space, and give net 10 to the Chinese government, because they need to allocate it to networks within their borders. This is a thing which has been proposed, though not lately. How is this any different? Overriding a reservation for shared use made by the authoritative standards body, in order to privatize a portion of that shared space. Yes, of course there should be a country code for Kosovo. But it should no more be taken from the reserved space than net 10 should be given away to any single government. This is simply not our decision to make. It’s the UN Statistics Division’s, unless ISO says otherwise. Whether they’re fast enough to suit your needs honestly isn’t their problem. Exposing something other than a reserved country-code in RIPE’s user-facing software is a Simple Matter of Programming, and keeps RIPE from looking like they’re overstepping their mandate in a particularly clueless way. -Bill