Re: [db-wg] Action item 47.2: Proposal for Adding Abuse Contact

On Apr 07, Engin Gunduz <engin@ripe.net> wrote:

For "inetnum:"s and "inet6num:"s, would it make sense to put "abuse-c:" which will reference to a person/role object by NIC handle, thus removing the need to bulk-update the inet(6)num objects when the abuse mailbox changes? What is the point? IRT records already work this way.

-- ciao, | Marco | [5602 pr0Eh4bg9IRRQ]