On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote: JLSD> we are indeed working in implementing the LIR-ALLOCATED proposal. Sounds great ;-) Are there any online resources with specifications or something about? JLSD> Having said that, I am not quite sure what Dmitry was looking for was JLSD> this because he is trying to express aggregation (which ought to be JLSD> expressed by a route object) and not re-allocation. Right now LIR JLSD> allocations are already covered by the inetnum object with the JLSD> ALLOCATED PA status. Not fully; as I said before, this exact case involves sub-provider without his own address space, so re-allocation would be rather flexible and appropriate solution, AFAIK.... JLSD> Regards, JLSD> Joao Thanks, Joao, for your attention. Have a nice weekend ;-) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------