Hello, Just one thing I'd like to point out : MUL_IDENTICAL seem to be based only on the person: field.... This seems to be fairly easy, but quite easy to be inaccurate... Could it be possible to think of something more precise that could help avoiding 'false' alarms ? Regards, Paul Dans son message (In his/her message), RIPE Database Manager ecrivait (wrote) :
Dear list members,
This is biweekly report on inconsistent objects in the RIPE whois database. The first 100 maintainers are listed as a table below sorted according to number of their inconsistent objects in the database. The rest of the maintainers which have inconsistent objects can be found at
http://www.ripe.net/db/state/mntnerreport1.html
You can find further information about the Consistency Project at
Fin du message inclus (end of included message). Paul Rolland, rol@oleane.net France Telecom Oleane/Direction Technique/Directeur France Telecom Oleane/Technical Direction/Director -- Please no MIME, I don't read it - Pas de MIME, je ne le lis pas Please no HTML, I'm not a navigator - Pas d'HTML, je ne suis pas un navigateur "I hope some day you'll join us, and the world would be as one" - J. Lennon