On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 02:57:15PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: Dear Working Group
This is the second Numbered Work Item.
(You can review https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2016-April/005190.html to ensure you have an overview of the next steps.)
--------- NWI-2:
The RIPE NCC was tasked with the following action point: AP69.2 [RIPE NCC] Come up with some straw man proposals for displaying history for objects where available.
The RIPE Database already provides a mechanism for object history. In our understanding the problem statement that motivated the action point is that some people are interested in seeing the history of *deleted* objects. It is our understanding that this interest is mainly focussed on primary (resource) objects.
However, it is not entirely clear to the RIPE NCC why this is useful. We also have some concerns, mainly non-technical, and therefore we believe that the problem statement and motivation needs to be better defined in the working group. ---------
The next step is to help refine the problem statement. I would appreciate it if working group participants with an interest in the history of objects speak up and elaborate on the issue.
The first thing/use case which came to my mind was a query from LEA within the timeframe set up by the retention act. This kind of query is legitimate and do not involve unnecessary queries either to RIPE NCC or to LIR itself about the history of the resource in question. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski@polsl.pl