12 May
2021
12 May
'21
10:46 a.m.
Hi Erik,
On 12 May 2021, at 09:27, Erik Linder <erik.linder@gmail.com> wrote:
The proposed cleanup is to only remove route(6) objects from RIPE-NONAUTH which are not registered in *any* region: too bad, because I have a use case where I have a couple of route objects in RIPE-NOAUTH but they are maintained by an old peering partner which seems to have no wish to help me remove those objects which are legit AFRINIC route objects. thus although I want to clean them, I can't.
regards Erik
There is a RIPE policy to cleanup conflicting route(6) objects in the NONAUTH database: https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-731 If you can create a ROA for the Afrinic prefix, a cleanup job will delete any conflicting route(6) for you. Regards Ed