Hello, On 29.06.00 17:40 Sebastian Willing <s.willing@mops.net> wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 02:38:12PM +0200, Thorsten Schreiner wrote:
I think they want to become a BIG player... but actually can't right
I cannot understand why the DENIC doesn't help funding with one
central ripe
database instead of setting up a own system. The usability and work of the ripe database was the best database ever, with automated robot for updates within minutes and a very good maintainer scheme. The RIPE didn't want to serve the .de-namespace for free any longer and it seems that the DeNic didn't want to pay for the services. I agree that the better solution would have been to pay the RIPE for service.
That was not an option we have as I tried to explain in another email.
In the meanwhile we have Handles with the same key XYZ-RIPE, with
different
contents in RIPE-db and DeNIC-db (not only the missing remarks, but also phone and fax, and if someone makes changes to one of the two handles the other will keep the old data).
No they are currently mirrored but we are not allowed to publish these data.
....and what if a handle is deleted from one DB but not from the other? Once the handle # is re-assigned, the owner of a domain depends on the server you ask.
The owner of the domain is the one stored in the DENIC database. Sabine
I think, the best thing is to restore the deleted records from RIPE backups and to remove the referer to the DeNic-whois-server until either the DeNic is paying or is running a workable service (maybe with references to the RIPE-whois-server for persons). Yours, S.Willing
Sabine Dolderer DENIC eG Wiesenhüttenplatz 26 D-60329 Frankfurt eMail: Sabine.Dolderer@denic.de Fon: +49 69 27235 0 Fax: +49 69 27235 235