Re: [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal

On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 12:32:42PM +0000, Niall O'Reilly wrote:

It's been very quiet on the list since the frantic activity at the end of last week. I expect day-to-day reality has imposed itself.

I've done some further thinking, and have reviewed the contributions last week on the db-wg list. I've tried to recognize the issues and alternatives in this message and to make proposals as straw-men for consensus.

I've used a bullet-point approach, as I think no-one is likely to have time to read anything more discursive. I'll happily explain anything that people find too terse.

Sounds good, but what do you consider 'primary objects', as in what templates will be modified to allow for abuse-mailbox and/or abuse-c ? Grtx, MarcoH