Hi, * "Christian Rasmussen" <chr@jay.net> wrote:
Im not sure if you have seen my previous mail, but I suggested to add a field called "abuse-address" in the maintainer object and make a rule saying Ripe NCC MUST check that the email address is correct by sending a mail to it and not create the maintainer object until the mail has been responded.
I don't think that this is useful, because I'd maybe like to set different abuse contacts for different inet[6]num objects, but want to be able to protect all those objects with one and the same maintainer object. Besides, I don't think that we really need to validate the existence of the email address supplied. I'd also like to see a mandatory/multiple abuse-c field containing a rfc-valid email address. regards, sebastian -- whois: sabt-ripe - phone: +49 (0)160 90759764 email: sabt@sabt.net - pgp-pubkey: 0xD008DA9C