Dear all, We would like to hear the opinion (positive or negative) of the RIPE database working group on the following proposals *before* changes are made to any of the RIPE database implementations. We might want to discuss things at the RIPE database working group session at the next RIPE meeting in Berlin. Kind regards, David Kessens RIPE NCC ----
Cengiz Alaettinoglu writes : From owner-rr-impl Wed Mar 13 20:11:16 1996 Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 11:12:08 -0800 Posted-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 11:12:08 -0800 Message-Id: <199603131912.AA16151@cat.isi.edu> From: Cengiz Alaettinoglu <cengiz@ISI.EDU> To: rr-impl@ripe.net Subject: polling for ripe dbase software changes X-Organisation: USC / Information Sciences Institute X-Phone: +1 (310) 822 1511 x219 X-Fax: +1 (310) 823 6714
Hi folks,
RA is considering: 1) for db-update to bounce back objects which uses ripe-181 style line continuations as error. 2) making the sugar words mandatory on as-in/out, i.e. from to announce accept. 3) not deleting these sugar words from the objects while storing them into the database file (and not reinserting them on whois).
We would like to know, if there is a strong opinion against this. Particularly, we would like to know if things would break in your site if we did this.
Thanks.
Cengiz
-- Cengiz Alaettinoglu Information Sciences Institute (310) 822-1511 University of Southern California http://www.isi.edu/~cengiz