Hi Gert On 07/03/2016 13:42, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:06:04PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 07-Mar-2016, at 6:03 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
- permit abuse-c: in inet(6)num: objects - permit abuse-c: to point to a normal person: object, not only role:
[???]
I???m actually +1 with these. And in fact even with the current spec there isn???t anything that says a person object can???t be abuse-c
yes there is. It must be a ROLE object. - though an outfit of any significant size might prefer to
add a role account just so that multiple people can receive and handle abuse complaints.
Yeah, for our LIR abuse contact, this totally makes sense - there is a department handling this (SPCA-RIPE), so the *option* of having a role: here is good.
OTOH for my personal PI /24, the only abuse-c: ever will be me personally, so not being able to reference my person: object but having to create a role: for myself is a bit silly.
It is called standardisation. Although I am sure you will not believe me it does actually simplify the data model if you do things in a standard way :) cheers denis
gert