22 Feb
2022
22 Feb
'22
1:33 p.m.
Hi Job, Colleagues,
On 22 Feb 2022, at 10:01, Job Snijders <job@sobornost.net> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 09:54:24AM +0100, Edward Shryane via db-wg wrote:
Not doing any validation is not an option given the Legal review.
Why not?
Kind regards,
Job
To be clear, the Legal review looked at the "geofeed:" attribute alone, and did not consider "remarks:". There is no requirement to validate "remarks:". Given this, and thanks to your feedback, I will drop my suggestion to validate "remarks:", and update the impact analysis for "geofeed:" only. Regards Ed Shryane RIPE NCC