On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote: [skip] JC> > It depends on the level of "responsibility" and functionality granted to JC> > and exercised by that end site. As I've said in a private mail already, JC> > we should ask the question about the usefulness of "assigning" (in the JC> > good old sense) very small amounts of addresses to sites which are tied JC> > in to the services of their provider anyway. I guess most of the ADSL, JC> > dial-up, cable-TV connection assignments sh/could be reviewed from that JC> > point of view. Moreover, I think that if (and only if) ISP is ready to be responsible to its customer network toubleshooting (and I think many, if not most of them actually are ready), AND real network holder is private person, then ISP person MAY be used as network admin-c, possibly with approprate comments: fields. Using Customer's name and ISP's address/phones in one object is not appropriate, as for me... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------