On 29/05/2015 13:33, denis wrote:
I am not against policy change if that is the only way forward. But let me
just throw a quick question back at you. If someone manages (legacy)
resources and have customers using some of these resources and all this is
documented in the RIPE Database and one of those customers 'could' cause
abuse, does it not make sense to advertise an abuse contact? Isn't this
just good management of resources?
in theory, advertising this is a good thing and won't do any harm. In
practice people will continue to use their old templates as before and
won't bother changing things unless there's some impetus to do so.
The LRH community is receptive to the idea of good stewardship of
resources, so I don't see why they wouldn't be interested in mentioning
legacy resources in the "Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database"
document.