On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:05:34PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:51:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
As I don't see any more comments on this, have we already reached consensus? Hiding more-specific objects by default is such a major change that I do not think it can be deployed after a discussion among just three or four people.
Nobody wants to hide more-specifics.
The goal is to show the inetnum: object (as before) and, in addition to that, the most-specific available irt: object. *In the default response*.
So if the inetnum: has its own mnt-irt: then show it, but if there is only one for the encompassing /16 (or whatever), then show the "parent" irt: - otherweise irt: is pretty useless.
That is exactly what I mean. And I don't see this as a discussion between 3 or 4 people, everybody can read this and participate. So the rest either doesn't care or agrees :-) Regards, Andre Koopal