13 Apr
2004
13 Apr
'04
6:22 p.m.
Marco, Of course my initial assumptions are crude ones. I believe we have to move the discussion from principled polemics to quantities on which we can base a decision. Can you quantify what will still be required after taking advantage of the kind of aggregation you suggest ? If not, are there any other volunteers out there? Best regards, Niall O'Reilly On 13 Apr 2004, at 16:59, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Method B: Provide every inet[6]num with an appropriately configured IRT object: This is not a good assumption because not all inet[6]num objects need to be updated to be protected, only the parent object does. Look at IRT-SIXXS and at how many objects it protects for a simple example.