Re: [db-wg] Fw: mntner with misleading primary key

On 07/09/2020 12:16, ripedenis--- via db-wg wrote:

enforce this on all 'new' MNTNER object creations I'm all for enforcing this syntax per you comment above.

Makes sense to _always_ be able to expect certain syntax rules for different DB objects types.

So if we go down this route where do we draw the line?

Current standpoint: For a "phase I". I would suggest enforcing syntax rules for _new_ objects. Future standpoint up for discussion: For a "phase II", walkthrough current DB primary keys to get a scope of how many objects primary keys would need to be updated to follow "phase I" enforced syntax rules(?) -- Kind regards, CHRIZTOFFER