6 Feb
2004
6 Feb
'04
2:02 p.m.
On 6 Feb 2004, at 12:45, MarcoH wrote:
Sounds good, but what do you consider 'primary objects', as in what templates will be modified to allow for abuse-mailbox and/or abuse-c ?
Sorry, I should have made this clearer. I'm thinking of inet*num, aut-num as 'primary'; person, role, mntner as 'indirect'. This would involve extending 6 templates for 'abuse-mailbox' and 3 templates for 'abuse-c'. Ppl may think of others. Niall