26 Jan
2017
26 Jan
'17
8:11 p.m.
seems to me that this strong identity binding is a feature, not a bug.
So how do you register two different abuse contacts for different abuse departments in house responsible for different parts of a network block, if abuse-c is hard-tied to the org object, and you can have only one?
Which nicely emphasizes the problem statement - it needs to be possible to define abuse contacts for more-specific inet(6)num: objects without introducing extra org objects...
fine with that. just do not want org being orgorgorgorg. arin has made a fun mess that way. randy