-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>; Ruediger Volk <rv@NIC.DTAG.DE>
Cc: aa-wg-chairs <aa-wg-chairs@ripe.net>; db-wg-chairs <db-wg-chairs@ripe.net>; db-wg <db-wg@ripe.net>; anti-abuse-wg <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
Sent: Mon, Feb 29, 2016 9:10 am
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] objection to RIPE policy proposal 2016-01


On 2/29/2016 3:09 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> On 29-Feb-2016, at 12:08 AM, Ruediger Volk <rv@NIC.DTAG.DE> wrote:
>> We have to assume that Internet number resource holders requested
>> to establish abuse-c
>> - usually are NOT focussed an abuse handling (different core business:-)
>
> With all due respect - assume that the number resource holder is a corporation engaged in, for example, brewing beer.
...
> Wouldn’t they have a corporate IT team tasked with looking at compromises on their network that are causing abuse / DDoS issues
...
> With abuse-c an external reporter can reach out to the appropriate team,
...


+1

d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net