6 Feb
2004
6 Feb
'04
4:31 p.m.
we might consider to also extend irt with the abuse-mailbox and allow abuse-c to refer to an irt object ?
why not remove irt entirely? it is not needed given this proposal.
Sorry, I have to disagree. The abuse / abuse-c /abuse-mailbox proposal(s) as being discussed will (maybe - maybe not) solve a different problem...
"less is more." -- mies van der rohe
and nothing is best?
randy
Wilfried.