Hi, On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 10:30:27AM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:
so the idea is we mandate that there be an abuse-c: so that there is an email address where we can send mail to which there will be no response?
you could just as easily make the same arguments about admin-c or tech-c.
But that's not half as botched as abuse-c: (I do think that having well-defined abuse contacts are useful, but the idea that the indirection has to go through an organization: object is a computer scientists' idea on how the world has to work, and that annoys me enough to hate the whole abuse-c: stuff) Hierarchical inheritance is great. Put abuse-c: in your top-level inetnum, and all is good. Put it into your org if you *want*. But if you have one particular inetnum that wants a different abuse-c:, having to add a new object to be able to do so is just... *argh* Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279