12 Jan
2004
12 Jan
'04
4:26 p.m.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Christoph Mohr wrote:
The problem with person object is that the email field is optional, so I don't see it as an option to refer to this object in abuse matters.
It should be forbidden to put in a person/role without email address as a tech-c or abuse-c. Or is there anybody out there who would to talk to a technical person by snail mail :-)
The last one "why is an email address not mandatory on person objects", has been raised before and from what I remember making this mandatory creates a race-condition in the initial setup when establishing a registry. (registry is needed for the email to work -> email is required working to create the registry). Grtx, MarcoH