On 2024 Jan 17 (Wed) at 17:08:38 +0100 (+0100), Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote: :Hi, : :In the DB-WG interim session I mentioned that there's currently a :discrepancy between person objects and role objects with regards to :contact information. :More specifically, person objects currently require a phone number :while role objects require an email address. : :I think we should try to bring person objects more in line with role :objects by removing the phone number requirement. Ideally I would want :it to be mandatory to have either a phone number or an email address :in order to not lose any flexibility but I'm not sure if that is :possible. : :During the session I asked if anyone was opposed to the idea and no :one said they were so I would assume that this is relatively :uncontroversial but please let me know what you think. : :-Cynthia Fully agreed. And while we are at it, address attributes should be made optional for person and role objects. -- Nasrudin walked into a teahouse and declaimed, "The moon is more useful than the sun." "Why?", he was asked. "Because at night we need the light more."