On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:02:42PM +0000, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
On 6 Feb 2004, at 12:45, MarcoH wrote:
Sounds good, but what do you consider 'primary objects', as in what templates will be modified to allow for abuse-mailbox and/or abuse-c ?
Sorry, I should have made this clearer.
I'm thinking of inet*num, aut-num as 'primary'; person, role, mntner as 'indirect'. This would involve extending 6 templates for 'abuse-mailbox' and 3 templates for 'abuse-c'. Ppl may think of others.
To get this clear you mean this ? inetnum abuse-c abuse-mailbox inet6num abuse-c abuse-mailbox aut-num abuse-c abuse-mailbox mntner abuse-mailbox person abuse-mailbox role abuse-mailbox Looks fine to me...the best of both worlds, although we might consider to also extend irt with the abuse-mailbox and allow abuse-c to refer to an irt object ? But maybe I'm opening another can of worms here. Grtx,