Hi, On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:00:01PM +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
There is no misunderstanding here at all. If you remove a maintainer this just exposes the fact that indeed you do no longer consider yourself responsible for maintaining these person objects. If no-one else puts on their maintainer and assumes responsibility the object is just unmaintained. But as long as a mnt-by: exists the assumption has to be that the maintainer is indeed responsible to maintain the data and indeed also for maintaining abuse contact information. Note well that the mnt-by: attribute gives the maintainer the authority to make changes.
Yes - I feel responsible to update that person: object, if need arises. You are constructing a responsibility to handle network abuse coming from an inetnum: that happens to reference this person: object from this (which whould be logical to assume for the the mntner of an *inetnum:* object). This is what I'm objecting to. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279