At 6:05 PM 6/18/96, David.Kessens@ripe.net wrote:
You can find a more detailed description below. Please let me know if you know of any other proposals that I forgot about,
Are these items in order of priority? (Sorry if i've missed something...) Anyway, congratulations on the job and good luck for the future. Regards, John
Hi John,
John Martin writes :
At 6:05 PM 6/18/96, David.Kessens@ripe.net wrote:
You can find a more detailed description below. Please let me know if you know of any other proposals that I forgot about,
Are these items in order of priority? (Sorry if i've missed something...)
No they are not in order of priority (That's something for the database working group to decide on). Our first priority is now to get the new 2.0 release outdoors as fast as possible to allow for some time (to fix any possible problems, it's .0 release) before I leave the RIPE NCC. Note that the maturity of many proposals is quite different. Some have already a concrete and published proposal approved by the RIPE database working group, some are just a note on a bright idea from somebody that first needs further investigation and discussion to get a good software specification.
Anyway, congratulations on the job and good luck for the future.
Thanks! Kind regards, David K.
participants (2)
-
David.Kessens@ripe.net
-
martin@terena.nl