http://www.ripe.de/ripe/wg/db/minutes/ripe-51.html says: 48.6 RIPE NCC To change DB behaviour to return IRT object [Misunderstanding of requirement, superceded by AP51.8, complete] Can somebody explain this? I tought that everybody agreed that it would be a good idea to always return IRT records for inetnum/inetnum queries, but this is still not happening. I could not find action 51.8 in the draft minutes of the AP WG. -- ciao, Marco
Hi Marco I am working on this as we speak. The code changes have been done and I am in the testing phase. I expect it to be in production next week. regards denis RIPE NCC Software Engineering Department Marco d'Itri wrote:
http://www.ripe.de/ripe/wg/db/minutes/ripe-51.html says:
48.6 RIPE NCC To change DB behaviour to return IRT object [Misunderstanding of requirement, superceded by AP51.8, complete]
Can somebody explain this? I tought that everybody agreed that it would be a good idea to always return IRT records for inetnum/inetnum queries, but this is still not happening.
I could not find action 51.8 in the draft minutes of the AP WG.
participants (2)
-
Denis Walker
-
md@Linux.IT