abuse stuff implemented in the DB, and thanks
Dear WG Members, earlier today we had a very interesting presentation by Shane, summarizing the various changes in the DB machinery related to implementing the abuse-mailbox facilities. I'd like to take this opportunity to remind you about the availability of the presentation slides from the RIPE50 meeting pages on the web, AND to say "thank you" to everyone at the NCC involved in the implemenation. Looks like a job well done, and in time for review during this meeting! Wilfried.
On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 11:42:34AM +0200, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
Dear WG Members,
earlier today we had a very interesting presentation by Shane, summarizing the various changes in the DB machinery related to implementing the abuse-mailbox facilities.
I'd like to take this opportunity to remind you about the availability of the presentation slides from the RIPE50 meeting pages on the web,
AND
to say "thank you" to everyone at the NCC involved in the implemenation. Looks like a job well done, and in time for review during this meeting!
Wilfried.
Hi, I would like to second this mail, but I have one remark. We are working to add an IRT object for our first LIR, we found out that we can't add a MNT-IRT to the allocation objects via the LIR-portal as MNT-IRT is not in the list of fields. Given the way IRT objects work you don't want to add them to all assignments, that really doesn't make sense. We are already working with RIPE staff, but I think if people really start using the IRT objects this gives unneeded additional workload to the RIPE staff. Can the MNT-IRT be added to LIR-portal allocation object editor? Regards, Andre
participants (2)
-
Andre Koopal
-
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet