RE: [db-wg] Draft Minutes of the RIPE 52 DB-WG meeting
4 May
2006
4 May
'06
1:13 p.m.
No, after Manchester the agreement was to return the irt record relevant to the queried ip/network. This is subtly different from the behaviour of -c, which may return a less specific inetnum object if the irt record is referenced by it.
And this, if I recall correctly was, at the heart of the argument in Istanbul Nigel
6810
Age (days ago)
6810
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Nigel Titley