...

we might consider to also extend irt with the abuse-mailbox and allow abuse-c to refer to an irt object ?

why not remove irt entirely? it is not needed given this proposal.

Sorry, I have to disagree. The abuse / abuse-c /abuse-mailbox proposal(s) as being discussed will (maybe - maybe not) solve a different problem...

"less is more." -- mies van der rohe

and nothing is best?

randy

Wilfried.