Re: [db-wg] RIPE64 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1 --> V2
This is a very late update/addition to the V1 draft agenda, bumping the version to V2 :-) Wilfried Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
Dear DB-WG folks, Chairpersons, "Meeting"!
This is the 1st draft of an agenda for the DB-WG at RIPE64 in Ljubljana, during CW16, April 2012.
For time slot allocations please refer to the most up-to-date meeting plan at http://ripe64.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan
The DB-WG Meeting is scheduled for *Thursday*, April 16th, starting at 14:00 in the afternoon (in parallel with the meeting of the IPv6-WG). The length of our timeslot is 90 Minutes.
Please feel free to propose additional topics to be discussed!
I'd also suggest that you submit your points of view regarding the topics on the proposed agenda on the mailing list, preferably before the WG meeting's start :-)
Best regards, hope to see you soon in Slovenia, Wilfried.
________________________________________________________________________
A. Administrative Matters . Welcome . select scribe . finalise agenda . approval of minutes from previous WG meeting(s) . review of action list
B. Data Base Update (N.N., RIPE NCC) [~20 min] - general update - geolocation status/implementation - internationalisation
C. RIPEstat (Daniel K., RIPE NCC) [~20 min] - new way of accessing database content - discussion about access control
D. Review of implementation of auth: filtering - filtering of public key information - lack of hint about type/number of attributes omitted
Y. Input from other WGs and/or TFs
Z. AOB ________________________________________________________________________
Hi Wilfried, On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 05:39:48PM +0000, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
This is a very late update/addition to the V1 draft agenda, bumping the version to V2 :-) [..]
Y. Input from other WGs and/or TFs
Can I put an action item on you (the DB WG) here, coming from APWG? "Check the capabilities of the RIPE DB regarding referrals for inetnum and inet6num objects, to support documentation of IP address transfers away from the RIPE service region." I won't be able to attend the DB WG session in person, but I think it should be clear enough what we're looking for :-) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
...going from v2 --> V3 Wilfried Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > This is a very late update/addition to the V1 draft agenda, bumping the > version to V2 :-) > > Wilfried > > Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > > >> Dear DB-WG folks, Chairpersons, "Meeting"! >> >> This is the 1st draft of an agenda for the DB-WG at RIPE64 in Ljubljana, >> during CW16, April 2012. >> >> For time slot allocations please refer to the most up-to-date meeting >> plan at http://ripe64.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan >> >> The DB-WG Meeting is scheduled for *Thursday*, April 16th, starting >> at 14:00 in the afternoon (in parallel with the meeting of the IPv6-WG). >> The length of our timeslot is 90 Minutes. >> >> Please feel free to propose additional topics to be discussed! >> >> I'd also suggest that you submit your points of view regarding the >> topics on the proposed agenda on the mailing list, preferably before >> the WG meeting's start :-) >> >> >> Best regards, >> hope to see you soon in Slovenia, >> Wilfried. >> >> ________________________________________________________________________ >> >>A. Administrative Matters >> . Welcome >> . select scribe >> . finalise agenda >> . approval of minutes from previous WG meeting(s) >> . review of action list >> >> >>B. Data Base Update (N.N., RIPE NCC) [~20 min] >> - general update >> - geolocation status/implementation >> - internationalisation >> >> >>C. RIPEstat (Daniel K., RIPE NCC) [~20 min] >> - new way of accessing database content >> - discussion about access control > > > D. Review of implementation of auth: filtering > - filtering of public key information > - lack of hint about type/number of attributes omitted > > >>Y. Input from other WGs and/or TFs - APWG: is there a referral mechanism for inet[6]num in the DB code? >> >>Z. AOB >> ________________________________________________________________________
participants (2)
-
Gert Doering -
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet