I consider this absolutely not ready for a consensus call. It introduces a new process with grave sanctions including

“Removing a presentation and video archive from the meeting website”
“Requiring that the violator leave the meeting/social immediately without a refund (as per the RIPE Meeting Terms and Conditions)”
“Banning attendance for future meetings (in the case of repeated violations, violence and extreme violations)”

Yet there is no mention at all of appeal, review or redress. This is not the way the RIPE community should operate.

I also suggest to have the language reviewed by the NCC legal team for legality and precision
before considering a consensus call.

Daniel

On 30 Aug 2019, at 13:13, Amanda Gowland wrote:

Thanks Hans Petter,

Let me work the final few comments into the draft, and then I'll poke some of the others to make sure they're happy for us to do that.

Amanda

On 30/08/2019 11:07, Hans Petter Holen wrote:

b) We can ask HPH to declare consensus + open the call for volunteers

Let me know when you are ready for me to do the last call for consensus on the RIPE list.

Maybe you also want a time-slot in the Community Plenary on Thursday.

Hans Petter

_______________________________________________
diversity mailing list
diversity@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/diversity